GMAT考试在4月5日进行了换库，楷维留学小编为大家整理分享4月份GMAT作文机经，一共有四篇GMAT考试4月写作机经及思路分析，考生朋友可以看看，作为一个复习GMAT的参考。

　　请随时关注楷维留学指南GMAT板块的更新，小编会为大家呈现更新更全更新的机经！

4月GMAT作文机经1：健身器材提高健康水平

　　【原始】

　　作文是有一本里面包含一个bodybuilder's exercise machines的文章的杂志卖的很好，几乎经常售罄，所以一个小镇认为应该多引进这些健身器材从而help to maximize the fitness levels of town's residents。 作文很好写，大家自由发挥。

　　【原题】AA61. 考古11月JJ32

　　The following appeared in the letters-to-the-editor section of a local newspaper:

　　“Muscle Monthly, a fitness magazine that regularly features pictures of bodybuilders using state-of-the-art exercise machines, frequently sells out, according to the owner of Skyview Newsstand. To help maximize fitness levels in our town’s residents, we should, therefore, equip our new community fitness center with such machines.”

　　Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.

　　一份叫Muscle Monthly的健康杂志规律性地刊登使用最好的训练器械的健美运动员的照片。据skyview报摊的摊主说它经常卖完。为了提高我镇居民的健康水平，我们应该给我们的新健身中心装备这样的器械。

　　【参考思路】

　　1.Causal relationship有他因：

　　1作者将健身视为fitness的唯一途径，但其实jogging、swimming等都可以强身健体，还可以控制饮食(have a balanced diet)。

　　2杂志卖得好得原因不一定是因为刊登这个机器，很可能是价钱便宜，或其他的内容吸引读者。

　　2、False analogy:

　　该机器使用于健美运动员，但不一定适用于普通居民。

　　3、Gratuitous assumption:

　　那些人很可能并不真正用这些机器，而只是摆出造型。

　　4、Doubtful survey:

　　这个杂志卖的好这个消息来自the owner of Skyview Newsstand. 这是什么角色，是机器提供商?还是主流媒体?所以，存在着信息来源不是很清晰。

　　【参考范文】

　　In this argument the author concludes that the new community fitness center should be equipped with the state-of-the-art exercise machines featured in Muscle Monthly magazine. In support of this recommendation two reasons are offered: (1) Muscle Monthly contains pictures of bodybuilders using such machines, and (2) Muscle Monthly is a popular magazine, as evidenced by the fact that it frequently sells out at the local newsstand. This argument is questionable on two counts.

　　First, a major implication of the argument is that the bodybuilders pictured using the machines in Muscle Monthly magazine reached their state of fitness as a result of using these machines. The only evidence offered to support this contention, however, is the pictures in the magazine. It is possible that the bodybuilders pictured use different equipment for their workouts and are merely posing with the machines for advertising purposes.

　　Second, the author assumes that machines that are suitable for bodybuilding will also be suitable to help maximize the fitness levels of the town’s residents. This assumption is highly questionable. Machines designed to increase muscle development are significantly different from those designed to increase cardiovascular fitness. Consequently, it is unlikely that the machines pictured in the magazine will be of much use to help maximize the fitness levels of the town’s residents.

　　In conclusion, this argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to show that the bodybuilders pictured using the exercise machines actually used the machines to reach their level of muscle development. Additionally, the author would have to show that the machines were suitable for increasing the fitness levels of the persons using them.