新G和老G，在给的材料上基本没有什么变化，惟一多出来的是8个instruction，这8个instruction就是让我们从不同的视角去剖析材料中的逻辑错误。

　　首先，官方指南明确指出，在阅读材料的时候，需要弄清楚材料中的以下一些内容：

　　1：材料中提供了哪些证明，支持或证据。

　　2：材料中明确地提出了哪些观点或结论。

　　3：材料中提出了哪些假设，而且这些假设可能没有经过证明。

　　4：材料中有哪些哪些暗示。

　　然后是8个instruction：

　　1.Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　2. Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.

　　3. Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

　　4. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

　　5. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

　　6. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.

　　7. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.

　　8. Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.

　　楷维升学指南认为这8个instruction其实可以归结为4个。而且从本质上来说它们又都是一样的，都基于材料中的逻辑错误。

　　specific evidence 其实就是针对逻辑错误进行具体的论证。

　　one or more alternative explanations 针对文中的事实给出其它的合乎逻辑的解释。

　　stated and/or unstated assumptions 就是作者的一些表面，肤浅，想当然的看法，即逻辑错误。

　　Questions 就是对逻辑错误进行提问式的指出，然后进行解答。

　　下面通过举例来说明如何列提纲以及如何组织文章。

　　以Argument 32 为例，相同材料的还有104,105,106 基本涵盖了这几种instruction。