楷维留学指南第一时间为各位整理网友回忆分享的的6月15日的托福机经回忆，这位同学会议的主要目的就是希望以后看过的同学不会再一个坑里摔倒两次，小小的玩笑，不过还是要感谢这位网友的分享，希望对大家有所帮助。

　　注意啦注意啦，各位童鞋各位童鞋，尽管ETS用乱拼把最近的考试搅成了一锅糊涂粥，但是聪明人就是能从一片云山雾罩中找到真理的方向。这不，侯哥机经再次命中本次考试的独立写作(20100424NA)以及独立口语Q1(20110820)和Q2(20100213)。命中完了之后咱不得不感慨，瞧ETS玩得多玄乎，真心不怕走路被麦当劳牌子砸到么。

　　所以，聪明的童鞋们。咱以后考前做三件事情好了：攒丰富人品，扎ETS草人，看侯哥机经。

　　这一次独立口语的故事是介样的。Q1比较去过的两所学校，Q2艺术家是否天生。最近一直跟学生们聊，Q1和Q2确实现在差别不那么大了，都会涉及到两个东西之间的选择和比对，这就要求大家相应的练习从不同角度看东西展开讨论的能力。Q1可以从软件和硬件两个方面比对，Q2 如果选择是，可以考虑说家族背景基因，如果说不是，则可以说教育环境的帮助。具体情况各位大侠可以参考口语和写作范文哈。

　　综合口语方面这次花样不大。Q3是学校里宿舍配厨房，学生同意，Q5又是接朋友还是去讲座产生时间冲突导致两难，可以说这俩话题简单逻辑清晰，对大家难度不大。Q4再次考出心理学理念，Q6则又是生物学，看样子TPO中Q4或Q6里的心理学和生物学段子多真不是扯，所以大家还迷茫什么啊，好好总结下这些学科的常见话题，理清和熟记答题思路吧。

　　六月二次命中,有木有!独立写作题目重复2010年4月24日北美。对于这道考题还是要注意在审题当中“名词解构”的方法，例如既然我认为衣着能体现一个人的性格，那么我就把这分成两种情况体现，第一，在生活当中的衣着能体现性格，第二在工作当中的衣着也能体现性格，那么这个题目思考分论点和例子也就不难了，一定要记住魁哥的“名词解构”法。有魁哥,写作变得so easy.

　　阅读方面此次祭出的是历史文明，地球科学和和偏生物学的组合。话题分别是文明的衰落，大陆漂移学说，害虫控制。这次考试内容给我们的感觉是ETS基本上祭出了阅读中最原始的学科组合和最核心的知识内容。考生们只要考前保持了拿TPO等官方资料进行练习的习惯，熟悉了这些常见的知识和词汇，要读懂其中的内容应该不会有难度。值得注意的是此次有两篇文章都采用了听力中比较常见的一总几分的讨论方式，甚至于跟综合写作中的阅读都有类似的地方，可谓逻辑清晰简单，所以说大家在平时的训练中多总结文体和题点的话，往往可以在很大程度上帮自己对文章进行化繁为简的处理。

　　听力里的两篇对话此次都稍显复杂。第一篇原本是标准的师生之间就学习问题展开讨论的office hours。但是随着学习问题延展开的讨论则牵连到了学生的实习安排，所以提醒各位大侠，对话里的考点主要是情节上的转折，务必关注都说到了那几件事以及分别如何处理。第二篇也是如此，学生组织了活动，老师就此表扬了学生，之后再转而开始聊这次出现的问题已经原因等，所以说大家要耐心发现对话里每一个分岔的环节，切记切记。

　　倒是这次的lecture部分没什么特别亮眼或刺眼的东西。Section1当中的两篇 lecture都跟地球环境有关。前一篇虽说是在比较天体，说明地球为什么有水而其他天体没有，但大部分讨论还是偏地球物理，第二篇则干脆就是讲热岛效应，很多东西都基于大家耳熟能详的知识和词汇，所以说平时积累了考听力就自然没有知识或是文字障碍。此外还有一篇文学方面的讨论，关系到的是诗歌体裁，TPO里关于香颂和北欧民间传说的讨论都与此类似，大家可以参考。

　　口语范文：

　　Q1：上过的两个学校，解释两个学校的区别。

　　I’d like to talk about the differences between the high school in my hometown and the high school in Beijing I’ve been to.

　　My hometown school is more focused on helping the students prepare for the college entrance examination of China whereas the Beijing high school pays attention to not only students’ academic capabilities, but also their extracurricular activities. This is why my hometown high school did a great job improving its teaching facilities, such as the computer lab and chemistry experiment center, while the Beijing school made a huge investment in building up the stadium, gymnasium and things like that.

　　Personally speaking, I like the second way of running a school more.

　　Q2：艺术家的天赋是天生的还是通过后天刻苦训练完成的。

　　I don’t agree with this statement and I have a couple of reasons.

　　First of all, actually we have a lot of artists who were not born in a family well-known for its artistic tradition. As long as those who attempt to be an artist go to study in a proper school of art where they receive quality training, at least part of them would have the chance to make an artist.

　　In addition, I don’t think being an artist requires only the genes from the family. If people with the gift don’t have the necessary surroundings, such as beautiful views or sounds of nature, to help them understand the gist of art and inspire their creativity, they would have trouble finding their styles.

　　写作范文：

　　Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: the way a person is dressed is a good indicator of his or her personality?

　　We can see a person's personality from many aspects of life, such as his or her gestures, the way he or she talks with others and especially the dress. Therefore when it comes to the statement that the way a person is dressed is a good indicators of his or her personality, I cannot agree more.

　　Undoubtedly we have to admit that sometimes the way a person is dressed is a wrong indicator of his or her personality. For example an extroverted person may wear bright color sometimes while an introverted person may love dark color at times. In addition, a rich man may wear in an ordinary way just like Steve Jobs, who always wears a black polo and a blue jean while a poor man perhaps shows off wearing expensive clothes.

　　However there are some arguments against these points above. First, although dressing does not work sometimes, it is effective in showing one's personality most of the time. According to a research in US, an outgoing person would like to wear yellow or red while. Furthermore, although Steve Jobs kept low profile in dressing, that does not mean that we can not tell whether he is well-educated. From his clean and casual way of dressing we can judge that he was a man who loved the life and paid much attention to details.

　　In addition from one's way of dressing in the daily life we can tell one's personality. A pair of thick glasses with casual clothes can be regarded as a nerd. Without studying so hard they would not be so near-sighted; sports shoes and T-shirt can be recognized as a sports fan; moreover one's way of dressing in the work place can show one's character as well. An office lady can be professional in dressing while a boss can be more like a big thumb; even in campus we can tell from dressing who are students with youthful wearing and who are professors with more mature clothes.

　　In conclusion we can tell from one's dressing the general personality even though some specific character takes time to be discovered. No matter you are mature or immature, careful or careless, extroverted or introverted, it can all be revealed on your dress.